A Marshall jury in Judge Payne's court made nobody completely happy Friday afternoon when it returned a verdict that the two asserted claims were not infringed, but not invalid either as anticipated or as obvious. The case was Corelogic Information Solutions v. Interthinx, 2:10cv132
Pages
Categories
- All Patent cases
- Commentary
- Eastern District Bar Association
- Eastern District of Texas news & events
- Judge Bush cases
- Judge Clark cases
- Judge Craven cases
- Judge Crone cases
- Judge Davis opinions
- Judge Everingham cases
- Judge Folsom cases
- Judge Giblin cases
- Judge Gilstrap opinions
- Judge Guthrie Cases
- Judge Heartfield cases
- Judge Hines cases
- Judge Love opinions
- Judge Mazzant Opinions
- Judge Payne cases
- Judge Schell cases
- Judge Schneider cases
- Judge Steger cases-
- Judge Ward cases
- Law Office Management
- Northern District of Cal. patent rules cases
- Papers
- Patent Cases: Recent Rulings for Defendants
- Patent Litigation dictionary
- Pope Benedict XVI
- Retired - Judge Brown cases
- Retired - Judge Cobb cases
- Retired - Judge Hannah cases
- Retired - Judge McKee cases (retired)
- SRBPS Firm News
- State Bar of Texas activities
- Video posts
