RPost Holdings, Inc., et. al. v. Readnotify.com Pty. Ltd., et. al., 2:11cv016 (6/29/12)
Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Holding: Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination DENIED
Judge Gilstrap denied the defendant's motion to stay pending reexam and trademark cancellation proceedings, finding that all three factors (prejudice, simplification of issues, and judicial economy) weighed against a stay. Specifically, the primary patent had already emerged from reexam, thus the issues affected by the reexam/trademark proceeding were relatively minimal. In addition, the case was filed over a year ago, and related to at least three other cases that were still pending before Judge Gilstrap.
From Docket Navigator
